Early Advocacy and the Fight for Equal Prize Money

Billie Jean King’s campaign for equal pay in sports began in earnest in the early 1970s, when the gap in prize money between men’s and women’s tennis was staggering. At the 1972 US Open, the men’s singles champion received $25,000 while the women’s champion earned just $10,000 — a 60 percent disparity that King found indefensible. She understood that such pay gaps were not rooted in merit or market demand but in systemic discrimination against female athletes. King’s response was direct and strategic: she threatened to boycott the 1973 US Open unless the tournament offered equal prize money for men and women. The United States Tennis Association, facing the potential loss of its biggest draw, relented. In August 1973, the US Open became the first Grand Slam event to offer equal prize money to both genders, setting a critical precedent that would pressure other tournaments to follow.

King recognized that individual leverage alone would not sustain the momentum. She worked closely with fellow players — including Rosie Casals, Margaret Court, and Chris Evert — to build a collective bargaining front. Their coordinated demands for consistent and fair compensation across the entire professional tour led to the creation of the Virginia Slims Circuit, a separate women’s tour that gave female athletes greater control over their earnings and schedules. This autonomous structure was revolutionary at the time, providing players with a platform to negotiate from a position of strength rather than as supplicants to male-dominated governing bodies. In 1973, King became the first president of the newly formed Women’s Tennis Association, which made equal prize money one of its founding principles. The WTA’s formation gave women’s tennis a unified voice and a formal mechanism to demand parity across all tournaments.

Beyond the tour structure, King also pressed for change through public advocacy and media appearances. She wrote op-eds, gave interviews, and appeared on talk shows to explain why equal pay was not just a matter of fairness but also of economic logic. She argued that women’s matches drew comparable television ratings and attendance figures, making the prize-money gap arbitrary and unjustified. Her willingness to speak candidly about finances — an area many athletes at the time avoided — helped normalize the conversation around pay equity and encouraged other female athletes to demand transparency from their own sports organizations. This early advocacy laid the groundwork for a sustained campaign that would span decades and extend far beyond tennis.

The Battle of the Sexes and Its Global Impact

No single event amplified King’s message more powerfully than the 1973 "Battle of the Sexes" match against Bobby Riggs. Riggs, a former world No. 1 men’s player who had won Wimbledon in 1939, spent months publicly claiming that women’s tennis was inferior and that no female player could beat a fit, 55-year-old man. His provocations were deliberately inflammatory, designed to tap into sexist attitudes and generate media attention. When King accepted his challenge, she understood that the stakes extended far beyond a single tennis match. She later recalled feeling "the weight of all women on my shoulders" as she walked onto the court at the Houston Astrodome on September 20, 1973.

The match was a global spectacle. An estimated 90 million people watched worldwide as King defeated Riggs in straight sets — 6-4, 6-3, 6-3 — in what remains one of the most-watched sporting events in history. Her victory was decisive and unambiguous, a public refutation of the sexist stereotypes that Riggs had weaponized. More importantly, the match shifted public perception of women’s sports. Before the Battle of the Sexes, many casual sports fans dismissed women’s athletics as less competitive or less entertaining. King’s performance demonstrated that female athletes could deliver high-quality, compelling competition that deserved equal recognition and compensation.

The international coverage of the match sparked conversations about gender equity far beyond tennis. Sports federations in Australia, France, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere began revisiting their prize-money structures in the years that followed. The match also influenced public opinion in non-sporting contexts, contributing to broader debates about sexism in the workplace and the value of women’s labor. King’s victory became a cultural touchstone, referenced in films, books, and political speeches for decades to come. The 2017 film Battle of the Sexes, starring Emma Stone as King, introduced the story to a new generation and reinforced the match’s enduring relevance. When high-profile equal-pay debates arise in soccer, basketball, and other global sports today, King’s 1973 victory is almost invariably cited as a turning point.

Founding the Women’s Sports Foundation and Institutional Change

Recognizing that individual victories would not create lasting change, King co-founded the Women’s Sports Foundation in 1974 alongside activist Donna Lopiano. The foundation’s mission was comprehensive: to promote equal opportunities, fair funding, and policy reforms for female athletes at every level — from youth leagues to professional organizations. Over the past five decades, the Women’s Sports Foundation has awarded tens of millions of dollars in grants and scholarships, funded research on gender equity in athletics, and advocated for stronger enforcement of Title IX in the United States. The foundation also works internationally, partnering with organizations in countries where cultural and legal barriers to women’s sports participation are especially high.

Title IX, the landmark U.S. law prohibiting sex discrimination in federally funded education programs, was passed in 1972 — just as King was rising to prominence. While Title IX did not directly mandate equal pay in professional sports, it forced high schools and colleges to allocate resources equally to men’s and women’s athletic programs. King frequently cited Title IX as a critical pipeline for creating the next generation of female athletes who would demand parity in professional settings. She testified before Congress multiple times to defend the law against attempts to weaken it, emphasizing that equal access in education was the foundation for equal opportunity in professional sports. The Women’s Sports Foundation also launched public awareness campaigns to educate parents, coaches, and administrators about Title IX rights and how to enforce them.

Beyond Title IX, the foundation pushed for institutional changes within sports governing bodies. It developed model policies for equal pay, equal media coverage, and equal investment in women’s programs. The foundation’s research arm produced data-driven reports that exposed pay disparities and provided ammunition for advocacy campaigns. For example, its annual "Women in Sports" report tracks prize-money gaps across dozens of sports and countries, giving activists concrete numbers to cite in negotiations. This emphasis on data and accountability has been crucial in moving the conversation from general principles to specific demands.

Global Impact: Beyond Tennis and the United States

King’s influence spread quickly beyond tennis and American borders. In the late 1970s and 1980s, she traveled extensively to meet with sports officials, politicians, and grassroots activists in Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America. She helped organize international women’s tennis tournaments in countries that had previously offered little or no prize money for women’s events, often using her personal reputation to attract sponsors and broadcasters. Her diplomatic efforts were instrumental in convincing the International Tennis Federation to adopt policies that tied tournament licensing to equal-pay standards, creating a mechanism for enforcing parity across the global tennis calendar.

One of the most significant milestones came at Wimbledon, the most traditional and prestigious of the Grand Slam tournaments. For decades, Wimbledon stubbornly maintained a pay gap between men’s and women’s champions, arguing that men played best-of-five sets while women played best-of-three. King and other WTA leaders publicly campaigned against this rationale, pointing out that women’s matches often drew higher television ratings and that the set-length argument was a pretext rather than a legitimate business reason. The pressure intensified in the 2000s, with King making direct appeals to the All England Club’s leadership. In 2007, Wimbledon finally announced equal prize money across all rounds — a victory that King called "a dream come true." She attended the tournament that year to personally thank the organizers and to underscore the historic nature of the decision.

King’s advocacy also had ripple effects in other sports. In soccer, the U.S. Women’s National Team’s fight for equal pay, which culminated in a historic $24 million settlement in 2022, directly echoed arguments King had made decades earlier. Players like Megan Rapinoe and Alex Morgan have explicitly credited King as an inspiration and have sought her advice on strategy and messaging. In basketball, the Women’s National Basketball Association’s collective bargaining agreements have increasingly reflected equal-pay principles, with players using King’s legacy to negotiate higher salaries, better travel conditions, and increased revenue sharing. In 2023, the International Olympic Committee added "equal pay across all events" as a requirement for host cities, citing King’s lifelong work as a key influence on its policy development. Even in non-commodity sports like track and field, swimming, and mixed martial arts, King’s advocacy has been invoked to push for parity in prize money and sponsorship opportunities.

Legacy and the Continuing Fight for Equal Pay

Billie Jean King’s achievements have been recognized with numerous honors, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2009 and the Sports Illustrated "Sportsperson of the Year" award in 2022. Yet she remains acutely aware that the fight for equal pay is far from complete. According to a 2023 report from the Women’s Sports Foundation, female professional athletes globally still earn, on average, about 50 cents for every dollar earned by their male counterparts. The gap is even wider in sports such as golf, MMA, and endurance events, where sponsorship deals and appearance fees often dwarf prize money. King has continued to speak out, using her platform to highlight these disparities and to call for structural change in how sports organizations allocate resources.

King’s broader point is that equal pay is not just about numbers on a check — it is about respect and recognition of athletic merit. She has argued that pay equity should be a baseline expectation, not a goal to be negotiated. Her foundation now runs training programs for female sports administrators and coaches, aiming to shift the power structures that perpetuate inequality. The Billie Jean King Leadership Initiative, launched in 2014, extends her advocacy into corporate diversity and inclusion, recognizing that sports pay gaps are part of a larger societal problem that affects women across all industries. The initiative offers workshops, research, and networking opportunities designed to help women break through leadership barriers.

In recent years, the WTA has continued to push for equal prize money at the remaining Grand Slams that still do not offer parity. The French Open, after years of incremental progress, finally matched men’s and women’s prize money in 2022. The Australian Open had done so in 2001, while the US Open was the first in 1973. Wimbledon, the last holdout, equalized in 2007. With all four majors now offering equal prize money, King’s initial 1973 demand has been fully realized at the highest level of the sport. That success provides a template for other sports to follow, even if the road to parity remains long. The lesson is clear: persistent, organized, high-visibility activism can overcome deeply entrenched discrimination.

The Next Generation of Advocates

King’s impact is perhaps most vividly seen in the new generation of athletes who actively combine competition with activism. Players like Naomi Osaka, Serena Williams, Novak Djokovic, and Coco Gauff have all cited King’s example when speaking out about prize-money disparities, athletes’ rights, and social justice. Osaka, for instance, used her platform at the 2021 US Open to promote mental health awareness and to amplify equal-pay discussions, wearing masks emblazoned with the names of victims of racial injustice. Serena Williams, who won 23 Grand Slam singles titles, regularly acknowledged that her prize-money earnings from early in her career would not have been possible without King’s crusade, and she often pushed for further equity in sponsorship and endorsement opportunities.

King has also mentored many young female athletes directly through the Women’s Sports Foundation’s athlete ambassador program. She encourages them to use their voices early, to form coalitions, and to demand transparency from sports organizations. This emphasis on collective bargaining — rather than individual negotiation — was a lesson King learned from her own battles. She often says, "Champions keep playing until they get it right," a slogan that resonates with activists across the globe. Her mentorship has been particularly impactful for athletes from underrepresented backgrounds, who see King as proof that activism and athletic excellence are not mutually exclusive.

The ripple effects extend beyond tennis. In soccer, players like Megan Rapinoe and Alex Morgan have cited King as a role model for their own advocacy. In basketball, WNBA stars like Sue Bird and Breanna Stewart have referenced King in their negotiations for better pay and working conditions. In track and field, athletes like Allyson Felix and Sha’Carri Richardson have spoken about the importance of King’s legacy in their own fights for sponsorship equity and media coverage. Even in emerging sports like esports, where gender pay gaps are stark, activists point to King’s blueprint for organizing and demanding change. The next generation is not merely inheriting King’s work — they are building on it, adapting her strategies to new contexts and challenges.

The Billie Jean King Leadership Initiative has also created a formal mentorship pipeline, pairing young athletes with seasoned activists and business leaders. The program focuses on teaching negotiation skills, media training, and coalition-building — the same tools King used in her own campaigns. Participants learn how to frame their demands in terms of business value and market data, rather than just moral appeals, making it harder for organizations to dismiss their claims. This pragmatic approach reflects King’s own evolution from a passionate advocate to a strategic operator who understands how to work within systems to change them.

Conclusion: A Pioneer Who Changed the Game

Billie Jean King’s role in the global fight for equal pay in sports cannot be overstated. She combined on-court excellence with off-court strategy, forging alliances, founding institutions, and using media events like the Battle of the Sexes to shift public opinion on a massive scale. Her efforts led directly to equal prize money at the US Open, Wimbledon, and eventually all Grand Slam tournaments. More importantly, she built a framework for advocacy that athletes in other sports have adopted with increasing success. Her legacy is not just a set of accomplishments but a methodology: persistent, organized, data-driven activism that refuses to accept discrimination as inevitable.

While pay parity remains imperfect — especially in team sports, developing nations, and non-mainstream disciplines — King’s legacy offers a clear path forward. Her work proves that systemic change is possible when advocacy is strategic, collective, and sustained over decades. She showed that individual talent can be leveraged for collective good, and that institutional transformation requires both inside negotiation and outside pressure. As long as female athletes anywhere are paid less than their male counterparts for equal work, Billie Jean King’s name will be invoked as both a benchmark and a call to action. The fight is not over, but because of her, the goal is closer than ever before. The next generation carries that torch forward, knowing that champions keep playing until they get it right.

Further reading and resources: